OUR NATIONAL DEBT

national debt

Nov 4, 2010

BUSH WAS RIGHT

Here are some of the Wiki-Leaks ( not a friend of the Republicans )

From Wiki-Leaks...........


By Evelio Perez
 By late 2003, even the Bush White House’s staunchest defenders were starting to give up on the idea that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

 But WikiLeaks’ newly-released Iraq war documents reveal that for years afterward, U.S. troops continued to find chemical weapons labs, encounter insurgent specialists in toxins and uncover weapons of mass destruction.

 An initial glance at the Wiki Leaks war logs does not reveal evidence of some massive WMD program by the Saddam Hussein regime — the Bush administration’s most (in)famous rationale for invading Iraq. But chemical weapons, especially, did not vanish from the Iraqi battlefield. Remnants of Saddam’s toxic arsenal, largely destroyed after the Gulf War, remained. Jihadists, insurgents and foreign (possibly Iranian) agitators turned to these stockpiles during the Iraq conflict — and may have brewed up their own deadly agents.

 In August 2004, for instance, American forces surreptitiously purchased what they believed to be containers of liquid sulfur mustard, a toxic “blister agent” used as a chemical weapon since World War I. The troops tested the liquid, and “reported two positive results for blister.” The chemical was then “triple-sealed and transported to a secure site” outside their base.
Three months later, in northern Iraq, U.S. scouts went to look in on a “chemical weapons” complex. “One of the bunkers has been tampered with,” they write. “The integrity of the seal [around the complex] appears intact, but it seems someone is interesting in trying to get into the bunkers.”

 Meanwhile, the second battle of Fallujah was raging in Anbar province. In the southeastern corner of the city, American forces came across a “house with a chemical lab … substances found are similar to ones (in lesser quantities located a previous chemical lab.” The following day, there’s a call in another part of the city for explosive experts to dispose of a “chemical cache.”

 Nearly three years later, American troops were still finding WMD in the region. An armored Buffalo vehicle unearthed a cache of artillery shells “that was covered by sacks and leaves under an Iraqi Community Watch checkpoint. “The 155mm rounds are filled with an unknown liquid, and several of which are leaking a black tar-like substance.” Initial tests were inconclusive. But later, “the rounds tested positive for mustard.”

 In WikiLeaks’ massive trove of nearly 392,000 Iraq war logs are hundreds of references to chemical and biological weapons. Most of those are intelligence reports or initial suspicions of WMD that don’t pan out. In July 2004, for example, U.S. forces come across a Baghdad building with gas masks, gas filters, and containers with “unknown contents” inside. Later investigation revealed those contents to be vitamins.

 But even late in the war, WMDs were still being unearthed. In the summer of 2008, according to one Wiki Leaked report, American troops found at least 10 rounds that tested positive for chemical agents. “These rounds were most likely left over from the [Saddam]-era regime. Based on location, these rounds may be an AQI [Al Qaeda in Iraq] cache. However, the rounds were all total disrepair and did not appear to have been moved for a long time.”
A small group — mostly of the political right — has long maintained that there was more evidence of a major and modern WMD program than the American people were led to believe. A few Congressmen and Senators gravitated to the idea, but it was largely dismissed as conspiratorial hooey.

 The WMD die-hards will likely find some comfort in these newly-Wiki Leaked documents. Skeptics will note that these relatively small WMD stockpiles were hardly the kind of grave danger that the Bush administration presented in the run-up to the war.

 But the more salient issue may be how insurgents and Islamic extremists (possibly with the help of Iran) attempted to use these lethal and exotic arms. As Spencer noted earlier, a January 2006 war log claims that “neuroparalytic” chemical weapons were smuggled in from Iran.

 That same month, then “chemical weapons specialists” were apprehended in Balad. These “foreigners” were there specifically “to support the chemical weapons operations.” The following month, an intelligence report refers to a “chemical weapons expert” that “provided assistance with the gas weapons.” What happened to that specialist, the Wiki Leaked document doesn't say...................................... WikiLeaks

http://m.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/wikileaks-show-wmd-hunt-continued-in-iraq-with-surprising-results/
m.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/chemical-weapons-iranian-agents-and-massive-death-tolls-exposed-in-wikileaks-iraq-docs/
warlogs.wikileaks.org/id/7726706C-22D1-404B-B73C-5BB9F23BD1ED/

George W. Bush was a visionary and a man of courage and what he did in Iraq was nothing short of heroic, he risked his stature and legacy to do what he had to do.

 In spite of the opposition's adamant defence of Saddam Hussein's murderous and tyrannical regime, President Bush was persistent and knew that Hussein (The Head of the Snake) had weapons of Mass destruction that could possibly be used against us in the future and knew that he had to be taken out.

 I know in my heart that history will be kind to President Bush, there are evil people and nations that want to destroy us and President Bush had the courage to to do what was necessary to start the fight for our survival and for that he must be saluted and commended..................



2 comments:

Evelio Perez said...

and yet the conclusion by many in this country is that there were no WMD's regardless of the many reports that they were moved to Syrya's Bekaa Valley.......and this is what you find in the major newspapers......

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/25/AR2005042501554.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6834079/

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/blumenthal/2007/09/06/bush_wmd

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/3135932.stm

http://articles.cnn.com/2004-10-06/world/iraq.wmd.report_1_nuclear-weapons-charles-duelfer-iraq-s-wmd?_s=PM:WORLD

I do believe that there were WMD's in Iraq, and I do believe that they were moved to Syria with Russian help. The reason I think this particular leak is important is because this one is coming from the left, they can't say that most of the leaked papers are true and then single out ones that they don't like as not true.......

Ariana said...

Hello my friend! I wish to say that this post is awesome, nice written and include approximately all vital infos. I'd like to see more posts like this.