RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT? ONLY QUALIFIED NEED APPLY

By Evelio Perez

  The mind of the average American Citizen is so focused on their everyday life that unfortunately our political process suffers every time we have to elect a new President of The United States and because of this, more times that we would want, our ignorance blatantly hurts us in not getting the most qualified candidate for this very important job.

  As we speak, our nation's capitalist system is in danger of collapsing (some say on purpose) and the need for qualified leadership is desperately needed to lead us out of the great mess that we are in. Specifically when dealing with the fiscal catastrophe that is threatening to bring down our precious way of life.

  How is it that we get some of these people for this all important job of President of the United States?

Mitt Romney

Well let's see, John F. Kennedy was elected because of his Father's money, connections and of course his looks, Lyndon B. Jonson was elected because he was Kennedy's Vice-President, Richard M. Nixon was elected because they put a Socialist (McGovern) to run against him, Jimmy Carter because he was running against Gerald Ford, Ronald Reagan (sometimes we get lucky) because he ran against Carter, George H.W. Bush because he was Reagan's Vice-President, Bill Clinton because he had the gift of gab (Great B.S.), George W. Bush because he was not Al Gore and finally, Barack Hussein Obama because he could read a teleprompter and because he was Black.

    Has anybody been elected because they were the most qualified?

  Folks, we are hurting as a Nation, our priorities are questioned, our division within the parties are widening, and there is a strong probability that we could go the Greek way and go bankrupt. What are we going to do next, elect another unqualified and inexperienced community organizer as president?

  In America, where all teachers, lawyers, doctors and engineers have to earn their college degrees and pass rigorous tests in their field to even be considered for their specific job. Shouldn't you in the least have to know how many states there are in the Union? Why don't we have the same standards for our elected officials?

 What an ideal concept would be if somebody was elected simply because they were the most able and qualified to actually do the job of the presidency, unfortunately the next election for President of The United States will continue as always to be decided by money, ideology, looks, and the gift of gab. 

 This is no longer a game where we can keep selecting unqualified people to play the part of president, this time the stakes are higher and the times demand that we select the most able for the sake of our survival.

  In Governor Mitt Romney, we finally had the right man at the right time for the right job.

Not only is he known by many business leaders, including Jim Cramer as the "best businessman in America" but he has also been called by CNN's Left leaning Piers Morgan as "the most ethical and cleanest politician in America".

  He has proven his worth as a Father, Husband, Governor, and a great Business leader.  Governor Romney is mostly known as someone who knows how to turn bad situations into good. He excelled as Governor of Massachusetts where he balanced the troubled budget without raising taxes. He also turned around the troubled Salt Lake City Winter Olympics in 2002 where he inherited a deficit of  $379 million and turned it into a $100 million dollar profit, but his best achievement of all as Anne Romney so eloquently stated many times was his job as a loving husband and father.

  In my book the choice was clear in 2012, but because of Bigotry, apathy from our own party, an unforgiving far left media and many irregularities in the polls, we lost that great opportunity to elect Romney and save this country. 

 It is apparent now more than ever that only Mitt Romney can do what needs to be done. He is as ready as they come and in my opinion the most qualified to deal with the catastrophe that is facing us today. He is exactly what we need if we hope to give our children the kind of future that our forefathers fought so hard to give us. We failed America in 2012, we can't fail this time around. Too much is at stake. 

                 MITT ROMNEY FOR PRESIDENT                                

ONE LAST CHANCE TO GET IT RIGHT

By Evelio Perez

 The soul and survival of The United States of America as we know it rests in the hands of the Republican party and it's representatives. Oh yes, it's the same party that four years ago turned their backs on the American people that trusted and elected them.

 As much as I liked President George W. Bush, he and the Republican party as a whole really blew it with the American people, they simply stopped listening to the screaming masses of desperate citizens that wanted a real Conservative change. From insulting over-spending of moneys we just didn't have to the perverts masquerading as conservatives. 

 The inadequate representation of our leaders led to the lack of defense of our moral and religious rights to the constant attack of our conservative values, we couldn't even control our own borders! 

 We were ridiculed, patronized and made to feel unimportant, and in the end the "we know better than you crowd" of our party gave us an unwanted candidate in John McCain. It was us who facilitated our defeat, and the rise of American Socialism. Simple as that!

 With George Soros's help and the American people's dissatisfaction of Republican handling of our government and promises of hope and change, Barack Hussein Obama was elected President of The United States.

 Since duping many Americans into voting for him, President Obama has shown his real radical intentions in which he is hell bent on reshaping our country into his idealistic Socialist model. 

 The once proud Democratic Party of Thomas Jefferson has not only been infiltrated but has been taken over by Soros and his far left fanatics. Their radical Socialist agenda is on it's way to making America vulnerable to our enemies by tearing us down from within.

 Folks,  as painful as it may be, we just can't afford to do business as usual anymore in Washington, we need to fix what seems to be unfixable and do what has to be done.

We must do more than like our candidates, we must be sure that they are qualified and be ready and able to do what they have to do, regardless of the consequences.
  
 We now have an outstanding and completely capable conservative candidate in Mitt Romney who I believe is willing to do what it takes, even if it costs him re-election four years down the line.

We cannot go on with business as usual, this is it!

 In November, we are going to have to unite and throw all the
bums out, clean house and start anew. We must do our 
homework and we must do it well.

 We have one last chance to get this country back on tract to the way our founding fathers intended and this time the Republican Party better get the message, this is their last chance to get it right because if they fail us again, they might not get another chance....................

WHO SHOULD CONSERVATIVE AMERICA WANT AS PRESIDENT?

By Evelio Perez

 Barack Hussein Obama with promises of hope and change has just been elected president of the United States, and in a span of just 16 months, has managed to outspend all the presidents of this great country from George Washington to George W. Bush combined, with trillions to spare by the time that he is finished destroying this country.


 Disaster seems to be just around the corner with all of Obama's irresponsible spending, massive socialist programs, record unemployment and many rookie foreign policy mistakes that leaves us vulnerable in all fronts.

Mitt Romney

 The opposition Republican Party has been de-clawed and silenced because conservatives were left out of the electoral discussion when the moderate Senator John McCain won the Republican nomination, leaving conservatives with no apparent representation.

 Who speaks for Conservative America? Is it Sarah Palin? Michelle Bachmann, Rick Perry, Newt Gingrich? Rick Santorum? Mike Huckabee? Rand Paul? How about Newt Gingrich? Jeb Bush? Ted Cruz? Maybe Rush Limbaugh? Sean Hannity is great, how about Bobby Jindal? or................how why not the man who leads in most of the CONSERVATIVE polls so far, why not Mitt Romney?

 The debate continues as to whom conservative Republicans prefer as their Presidential candidate in 2012 and it is up to us to make sure that this next process is done with the highest regard and respect to all Republican candidates.Isn't it time to reclaim the party of Ronald Reagan? Did we finally learn the brutal lesson that watering down conservative values will always lead us to defeat time and time again?  
      
       Who will speak for Conservative America?

 Some of us want to alter reality and cast Mitt Romney as something other than a conservative. I suggest that before we start acting like liberals and make up stories to bend the truth, we start reading up on the facts and start acting like Republicans, we need to stop bad-mouthing our own!

 We need to show America that we are the party of integrity, morality and that above all the party that will defend the rights as written in the U. S. Constitution, we not only have to talk about the values that we treasure, we have to also live by them and Mitt Romney can make that claim all throughout his life. 

 The fact is that Mitt Romney leads in all of the latest conservative polls, he has the money to run a strong campaign, he is squeaky clean, he has valuable economic experience and he has the backing of the Republican Party, he simply fixes everything he touches.


 It would be a real travesty if we lost this next election to Obama, again because we are so blinded by our own candidate that again we unfairly attack other candidates with rumors, lies and outright religious bigotry to gain the upper hand to where we will eventually destroy ourselves and any chance that we have to win in 2012.

 I have said it before and I will state it again, If Mitt Romney is not the nominee of our party, I will support any conservative that wins the nomination in order to defeat Obama and stop the destruction of this great country.
CAN WE ALL MAKE THIS PLEDGE?

BUSH WAS RIGHT

Here are some of the Wiki-Leaks ( not a friend of the Republicans )

From Wiki-Leaks...........

By Evelio Perez

 By late 2003, even the Bush White House’s staunchest defenders were starting to give up on the idea that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

 But WikiLeaks’ newly-released Iraq war documents reveal that for years afterward, U.S. troops continued to find chemical weapons labs, encounter insurgent specialists in toxins and uncover weapons of mass destruction.

 An initial glance at the Wiki Leaks war logs does not reveal evidence of some massive WMD program by the Saddam Hussein regime — the Bush administration’s most (in)famous rationale for invading Iraq. But chemical weapons, especially, did not vanish from the Iraqi battlefield. Remnants of Saddam’s toxic arsenal, largely destroyed after the Gulf War, remained. Jihadists, insurgents and foreign (possibly Iranian) agitators turned to these stockpiles during the Iraq conflict — and may have brewed up their own deadly agents.

 In August 2004, for instance, American forces surreptitiously purchased what they believed to be containers of liquid sulfur mustard, a toxic “blister agent” used as a chemical weapon since World War I. The troops tested the liquid, and “reported two positive results for blister.” The chemical was then “triple-sealed and transported to a secure site” outside their base.
Three months later, in northern Iraq, U.S. scouts went to look in on a “chemical weapons” complex. “One of the bunkers has been tampered with,” they write. “The integrity of the seal [around the complex] appears intact, but it seems someone is interesting in trying to get into the bunkers.”

 Meanwhile, the second battle of Fallujah was raging in Anbar province. In the southeastern corner of the city, American forces came across a “house with a chemical lab … substances found are similar to ones (in lesser quantities located a previous chemical lab.” The following day, there’s a call in another part of the city for explosive experts to dispose of a “chemical cache.”

 Nearly three years later, American troops were still finding WMD in the region. An armored Buffalo vehicle unearthed a cache of artillery shells “that was covered by sacks and leaves under an Iraqi Community Watch checkpoint. “The 155mm rounds are filled with an unknown liquid, and several of which are leaking a black tar-like substance.” Initial tests were inconclusive. But later, “the rounds tested positive for mustard.”

 In WikiLeaks’ massive trove of nearly 392,000 Iraq war logs are hundreds of references to chemical and biological weapons. Most of those are intelligence reports or initial suspicions of WMD that don’t pan out. In July 2004, for example, U.S. forces come across a Baghdad building with gas masks, gas filters, and containers with “unknown contents” inside. Later investigation revealed those contents to be vitamins.

 But even late in the war, WMDs were still being unearthed. In the summer of 2008, according to one Wiki Leaked report, American troops found at least 10 rounds that tested positive for chemical agents. “These rounds were most likely left over from the [Saddam]-era regime. Based on location, these rounds may be an AQI [Al Qaeda in Iraq] cache. However, the rounds were all total disrepair and did not appear to have been moved for a long time.”
A small group — mostly of the political right — has long maintained that there was more evidence of a major and modern WMD program than the American people were led to believe. A few Congressmen and Senators gravitated to the idea, but it was largely dismissed as conspiratorial hooey.

 The WMD die-hards will likely find some comfort in these newly-Wiki Leaked documents. Skeptics will note that these relatively small WMD stockpiles were hardly the kind of grave danger that the Bush administration presented in the run-up to the war.

 But the more salient issue may be how insurgents and Islamic extremists (possibly with the help of Iran) attempted to use these lethal and exotic arms. As Spencer noted earlier, a January 2006 war log claims that “neuroparalytic” chemical weapons were smuggled in from Iran.

 That same month, then “chemical weapons specialists” were apprehended in Balad. These “foreigners” were there specifically “to support the chemical weapons operations.” The following month, an intelligence report refers to a “chemical weapons expert” that “provided assistance with the gas weapons.” What happened to that specialist, the Wiki Leaked document doesn't say...................................... WikiLeaks

http://m.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/wikileaks-show-wmd-hunt-continued-in-iraq-with-surprising-results/
m.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/chemical-weapons-iranian-agents-and-massive-death-tolls-exposed-in-wikileaks-iraq-docs/
warlogs.wikileaks.org/id/7726706C-22D1-404B-B73C-5BB9F23BD1ED/

George W. Bush was a visionary and a man of courage and what he did in Iraq was nothing short of heroic, he risked his stature and legacy to do what he had to do.

 In spite of the opposition's adamant defence of Saddam Hussein's murderous and tyrannical regime, President Bush was persistent and knew that Hussein (The Head of the Snake) had weapons of Mass destruction that could possibly be used against us in the future and knew that he had to be taken out.

 I know in my heart that history will be kind to President Bush, there are evil people and nations that want to destroy us and President Bush had the courage to to do what was necessary to start the fight for our survival and for that he must be saluted and commended..................

LET'S GET RID OF THE UNITED NATIONS

By Evelio Perez

  The United Nations, the great democratic world protector of good, the savior of the world, the judges between good and evil, etc.......... What are they doing, you might ask? 

 Kim Jong Mentally Ill is running amok in North Korea building nukes as fast as he can, while oppressing his people and they do nothing. 

 Mahmoud  Ahmadinejad is bravely telling America and the world to kiss his big and bad Iranian ass, while Iran builds their own arsenal of nuclear weapons right under the noses of the International community, all this while denying the Iranian people any basic human rights.................... and the U.N. does  nothing.


 The state of Israel (the only democracy in the Middle East) becomes more and more isolated by United Nations and it's enemies. (Together they will make sure that Israel is destroyed.)

 Human rights abuses around the world are becoming more and more rampart by the same people that seem to control the dialogue at the U.N.

 The United Nations as a whole talk a big game...... but the killing continues, they just don't care. 
Who are protecting the people from these outlaw nations and their brutal dictators from torture and death? Certainly not the United Nations.


 They did NOTHING 90 miles away for 50 years while the Soviet backed Castro brothers fermented death and destruction throughout their many adventures in South America. 

 Fidel Castro and his cronies assassinated hundreds of thousands of innocents and destroyed millions of lives in Cuba and around the world in the name of a failed Communist revolution.

The United Nations have done nothing in the Sudan while thousands of Christians are being slaughtered..... but it does not stop there, Myanmar? Iran? Tibet? Who cares? The killing continues.

 The one man who stood up for Democracy and FREED 40 million people from some of these Terrorist nations was President George W. Bush, not the United Nations like they were supposed to, instead of being thankful for standing up to these Criminals, they demonized him and aligned themselves with America's enemies.


 The United Nations with all of its worldly powers, stands by as these thugs and others around the globe to totally make a mockery of this worldly organization, and they do it in the name of world peace !

This is the ideal place for tyrants, thugs and murderers to tell us how wrong and bad we are on anything and everything, it's mind-boggling!

Arafat at the U.N.

Can we please stop supplying these incompetent boobs all of these billions of dollars to do nothing in our interest? When are we going to realize that these people are not our friends !

 I say enough is enough, so please stop ! We just can't continue with this farce anymore, we simply can't afford it. 

 It's time to take a stand and either tell them to do their jobs or take a hike, but like always we will have to do the dirty work ourselves.

 I think the United Nations building would look better in France, don't do you think ?